Monday, 27 June 2011

Perpetual Learning

We all know the saying "Sharing knowledge will increase knowledge". Not only do we know the saying, but have also certainly experienced it. The reason is quite simple. When we need to share our knowledge, on the one hand we naturally get motivated to learn thoroughly to really be able to add value and on the other get motivated to discover and learn as we get questioned by the ones with whom we are sharing our knowledge.

In my personal experience as a leader, apart from setting the direction to develop a sense of security to the teams and organisations I have lead, asking the right questions to my "followers" for catalysing their self-discovery has been the second most important success factor to create the passion that resulted in exceptional performance. Of course the other standard leadership skills and qualities like entrepreneurship, empathy, initiative, assertiveness, assessing, giving/receiving feedback, networking, having the big picture, process focus, cooperation, communication, cross functional thinking, good domain knowledge, etc.

The purpose of coaching is exactly to catalyse the self-discovery. All great leaders in our society seem to have this skill well ingrained. Not only have they created a noble vision and have got many people go behind them to realize this vision but also have created great leaders. Needless to say a noble purpose, their character and the other standard qualities I have listed above would have always been there.

Many of us I am sure would have learnt this catalysing skill the hard way as we matured in our leadership capabilities, in some cases spanning over a decade or so. I am sure coaching our teenage kids and/or brothers/sisters would have been one of the biggest leadership learning opportunity. Our coaching skills would have also come from our elders and others who would have coached us. Our main learning method was through experience in life or in simulations during a training. Imagine being comfortable with this skill of catalysing self-discovery as we take on our first leadership role in the mid twenties. Wouldn't it be a great competitive advantage?

The average age in India is expected to be 29 years by 2020. Presently more than half of our population is less than 25 years of age and more than 65% less than 35 years of age. Taking from our own experience, we can really catapult the learning process if we can provide a platform for people to help others catalyse their self-discovery and at the same time helping oneself by experiencing this extremely important leadership skill. This pool of catalysers what one can call as Peer-Coaches or Reciprocal-Coaches will be my first step towards creating more than 100 exceptional leaders by 2020. Once this pool is created then a series of other value added learning services like consultancy, Socratic training as well as best-in-class business solutions like competency management, process management, benchmarking, etc. can follow.

Of course this model of learning must be financially viable and yield an excellent ROI. Going by the numbers in India alone, the best-in-class leadership solutions can in my opinion be available at really affordable prices. The main challenge would be to get a critical mass of at least 1,000 willing, like minded, young potential exceptional leaders.

Thursday, 23 June 2011

Sustainable Performance

In organizations it is quite easy to produce exceptional results once or occasionally against all possible odds. I use the word easy due to the relative effort needed to produce exceptional results consistently on a sustainable basis. I want to share my learning to produce consistently sustainable results organizations.

1. Identify intermediate check points, when and how frequently to check
2. Establish what to check or "KPI: Key Performance Indicator" and how to calculate or arrive at this KPI
3. Define who calculates the KPI, who analyses the actual situation, forecasts the final result, compares with the target and defines the immediate containment, corrective and preventive actions.
4. Ensure that the KPI is released only after step 3 is completed.
5. Define who verifies that step is is being performed and at what frequency is this verified (once every three cycles would be preferred)
6. Assess the adherence (Steps 1 to 5) to the defined steps and modify system to ensure adherence.

Go ahead and get consistency through sustainable results in your business using the above steps. I must caution that it may take a several cycles till consistency is achieved. Apart from this consistency doesn't mean that the targets are met. Here you need to use these steps for the basic stability (SDCA) and deploy task forces to work with gaps and develop measures to reach the target (PDCA).

Sunday, 29 May 2011

Organisational Health Check

We normally think of money and head count as the necessary resources to do a business. I am of the opinion that much more resources are needed either to perform a simple task or run a big business. I call these resources as CAPABILITIES (PLEFIMS: People, Leadership, Expertise, Finance, Infrastructure, Management, Speed). Here I am listing these CAPABILITIES to build a base for the concept of organizational health check, that is very simple. Once we assess the AVAILABILITY on a scale of 1 to 5 (Adequate, Satisfactory, Good, Very Good and Excellent) of these CAPABILITIES we can very fast define the most important focus areas for improvement in the organizational health.

CAPABILITIES

1. People:
People are the most important for any job we do. Under people not only the employees but also customers, vendors and business partners are considered. The main question is how good is the networking and how right are the people we know. In school we used to say that the wave length matched between the thick pals. Though in business this is not always possible, it is imperative that we consider the character when we count our people.
2.Leadership:
We can only achieve outstanding consistent performance if and only if true passion can be ignited in the people that we spoke of under 1. True passion comes only if the purpose is noble and this is what leadership is all about. Creating a vision, mission, values, business ethics, strategy and approach with a learning environment and open culture to a secure future with a noble cause.
3. Expertise:
In today's world just having a noble cause with passionate people can only be used for monetary benefits, provided know-how of the product/service in question as well of the direct processes needed to produce is available. Product/service core competencies, the related IP rights, perceivable USP's are all accessible and known either through available documentation or through the people considered under 1.
4. Finance:
Needless to say money is always needed to perform a task or run a business. Market capitalization, asset base, profitability, cash reserves, outstanding receipts as well as payments need to be thoroughly analyzed. When checking an internal performance the consistency in adhering to defined budgets and the ability to make correct expense forecasts can be used as a capability for assessing the organizational health.
5. Infrastructure:
Buildings, machinery, equipment, hardware, software, etc, would all fall into the infrastructure category. It is mandatory not just to check the availability, but also check the usability and the condition of the infrastructure. It is very common in business to exploit (over use without proper maintenance) the infrastructure at the cost of getting fast results. This common phenomenon not only erodes the infrastructure but also demoralizes the people using this infrastructure.
6. Management:
One time success can be got easily without management, since management in my perception is the art of consistently doing the job in a most optimum and efficient manner. Therefore policies, guidelines, systems, processes and procedures come under management. It is imperative that cascaded (across hierarchy levels) targets are deployed from the business plan, a meaningful MIS along with cascaded reviews/feedback for all key performance indicators/results as well as absolute clarity of roles/responsibilities exist. Both the target deployment (top-down) and reporting (bottom-up) through hierarchy must be having the same unique path.
7. Speed:
Last but not the least important is time as a resource. In order to have the speed in whatever we do, it is essential that a SDCA/PDCA (Standardize/Plan, Do, Check and Act) mindset is evident and constantly a formal learning system exists to reflect and learn from both good and bad experiences. Speed also comes with a clear delegation accompanied by total clarity on who is accountable in organizations for various tasks. The biggest deterrent to speed is the micro-management culture and lack of confidence and trust across hierarchy as well as peers.

AVAILABILITY

A. Adequate:
A capability can be assessed as adequate in case of anxiety concerning a capability.
B. Satisfactory:
Provided the routine is being done normally then a capability falls into this category.
C. Good:
Being proud of a capability can be a good reason to assess in this category.
D. Very Good:
You are not only proud, but also feel comfortable to talk about relevant capability openly.
E. Excellent:
You would have received recognition for the relevant capability from outsiders.

It is quite obvious that these capabilities will lead to key results specific to the organization that meets all the stakeholder needs as well as perception and performance indicators concerning each of the stakeholders. I am listing all the stakeholders once again. Shareholders, Customers, Employees, Business Partners and Society are the 5 main stakeholders for any organization.

The CAPABILITIES are also the basis for preparing a SWOT. However, before preparing a SWOT it is essential that the goals or what we want to achieve (our dream) must be the starting point. As far as strengths and weaknesses are concerned the AVAILABILITY assessment will automatically show the areas to further check. For the opportunities and threats the questions must be "Which of the PLEFIMS is available with others that can benefit me?" and "Which of my PLEFIMS may get siphoned out by others?".